Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar is facing backlash from Congress MP Manickam Tagore for his remarks comparing Mahatma Gandhi with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Dhankar made the comments during an event in Mumbai, where he referred to Gandhi as the ‘Mahapurush’ of the last century and PM Modi as the ‘Yugpurush’ of this century. These comments have stirred controversy and sparked criticism, with Tagore accusing Dhankar of crossing the limits of sycophancy.
The event in question was organized to celebrate the birth anniversary of Jain mystic and philosopher Shrimad Rajchandra. Dhankar praised both Gandhi and Modi for their contributions to India, highlighting their connection to Shrimad Rajchandraji. He applauded Gandhi for his role in freeing India from British slavery through Satyagraha and non-violence. Dhankar also commended Modi for leading India on a path of progress and development.
The controversy erupted when a video clip of Dhankar’s speech was shared on social media by the official ‘X’ handle of the Vice President of India. Congress MP Manickam Tagore responded to the video on the social media platform ‘X’, expressing his disapproval of the comparison between Modi and Gandhi. Tagore deemed it shameful and accused Dhankar of sycophancy. He called out Dhankar for crossing the limits of respect and value with his remarks.
This controversy reflects the ongoing political divisions and discourse surrounding the legacies of Mahatma Gandhi and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Critics argue that comparing Gandhi, who championed non-violence and fought against British colonial rule, with Modi, who is known for his nationalist and development-oriented policies, is inappropriate and diminishes Gandhi’s contributions. Supporters of Modi argue that he has played a significant role in shaping modern India and deserves recognition for his leadership.
The controversy surrounding Dhankar’s remarks highlights the complex dynamics of Indian politics and the differing interpretations of historical figures. It also underscores the importance of respectful and nuanced discussions when addressing the legacies of influential leaders. As political polarization continues to persist, it remains crucial for leaders to engage in dialogue that fosters understanding and unity rather than deepening divides.
