The Chief Justice of India raised important questions regarding the adherence to federalism by the government in the context of the abrogation of Article 370 and the revocation of Jammu and Kashmir’s status as a full-fledged state. The Chief Justice inquired about whether the government considered the principle of federalism while taking these significant steps. This inquiry came during a hearing related to Article 35A, which provides special rights to permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. The Chief Justice questioned whether the revocation of Article 35A took away fundamental rights while granting special rights solely to the permanent residents of J&K. The government was asked to provide an explanation in response to these important concerns. This inquiry by the Chief Justice highlights the significance of upholding federalism and considering the broader ramifications of constitutional changes.