Opposition Members of Parliament (MPs) have raised concerns about the haste with which draft reports on bills to replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Evidence Act are being adopted.
The MPs argue that important legislation such as this, which has the potential to significantly impact the legal framework of the country, should not be rushed through without proper discussion and deliberation.
They believe that such bills require in-depth scrutiny as they are meant to address the concerns of various stakeholders, including legal experts, judges, and the general public.
The MPs also question the need to replace the existing laws, considering that they have been in place for many years and have been subject to several amendments over time.
Furthermore, they express concern that the new bills have not been adequately debated and analyzed in parliamentary committees, which are important forums for the examination of legislation.
The MPs argue that rushing through these bills could lead to unforeseen consequences and may undermine the democratic process.
They call for a more inclusive and transparent approach towards the drafting and adoption of these bills, with ample opportunity for public consultation and input from legal experts.
In response, government officials maintain that the bills have gone through the necessary processes and have been thoroughly examined before being introduced in parliament.
They argue that the existing laws need to be updated to address emerging challenges and ensure that they are in line with modern legal principles and international norms.
These bills are seen as part of the government’s larger efforts to reform and streamline the country’s legal framework.
However, the opposition MPs remain skeptical and continue to demand further scrutiny and discussion before the bills are finalized and passed into law.