August 3, 2025

Corporal punishment remains a controversial and pervasive method of discipline in many conservative cultures, particularly in India, where it is often seen as a right of passage passed through generations. A nationwide survey indicates that nearly 77.5% of parents endorse its use. However, this traditional mindset warrants a critical evaluation in light of new research revealing the detrimental effects of physical punishment on children. Studies have repeatedly shown that children subjected to corporal punishment are more likely to face behavioral and emotional issues, including lifelong struggles with depression and low self-esteem. A groundbreaking 2021 study highlighted alarmingly unique brain responses in children who experience spanking, associating these reactions with more severe forms of abuse. Despite achieving temporary compliance, corporal punishment fails to produce long-term positive changes, raising questions about its validity as a discipline strategy. Proponents of moderate corporal punishment often highlight the vagueness of research findings that do not provide blanket statements against the practice. The complex interplay of short-term compliance and long-term behavioral outcomes can complicate discussions. However, even with some studies suggesting uncertainty about the impact, relying on this uncertainty to justify continued use of corporal punishment is ethically dubious. Furthermore, data consistently underlines the ineffectiveness of corporal punishment, positing the need to rethink its application in parenting. The repercussions of corporal punishment extend beyond immediate effects on children; it may instigate a cycle of inter-generational trauma, where adults who were physically punished in childhood are more likely to replicate these actions with their offspring. This cycle raises critical questions about whether corporal punishment is a cultural tradition or a trauma perpetuated through generations. Rather than vilifying parents who employ physical discipline, it's essential to understand the broader social and psychological contexts that inform their choices. Economic hardships often exacerbate the reliance on corporal punishment, which may seem like a quick fix for overwhelmed caregivers who perceive it as effective yet harmless, partly due to cultural conditioning. Some advocate for stringent bans on corporal punishment, pointing to successes in both developed and developing nations. While such legal reforms could constitute a significant initial step towards addressing this issue, they do not encompass the requirement for a profound cultural paradigm shift. Laws have limited effectiveness in a society where entrenched social norms, beliefs, and informal practices dominate individual households. Real and lasting change necessitates a dual approach — legal reform combined with initiatives aimed at shifting cultural attitudes. Education about the detrimental effects of corporal punishment must accompany legal measures to transform parenting norms. By equipping caregivers with non-violent disciplinary tools, society can foster healthy parenting practices and replace outdated punitive methods. The fight against corporal punishment is undeniably challenging, necessitating a commitment from various sectors, including psychological, social, and institutional support systems. Acknowledging that corporal punishment inflicts long-term harm far outweighing any perceived cultural benefits is a critical first step toward meaningful change. The discussion should center not on the fine line between discipline and abuse but rather on questioning the existence of such a distinction altogether. A collective effort is required to break this damaging cycle and pave the way for a healthier future for children and parents alike.

Read More at Thehindu →

Tags: Corporal punishment, Child abuse, Parenting, Trauma, Education, Cultural norms,