July 18, 2025

A decision to eliminate Urdu as a job requirement in Jammu and Kashmir has triggered a heated debate on identity and inclusion. The move has been criticized by some as a tactic of divisive politics. Advocates of retaining Urdu argue that the language has historical importance in the region, with revenue records dating back to before Independence being maintained in Urdu. Therefore, they assert that proficiency in Urdu is a natural necessity for certain job roles. The decision has polarized opinions, with some viewing it as a step towards linguistic inclusivity, while others perceive it as a threat to cultural heritage. The linguistic aspect of the controversy has also intertwined with political overtones, as different groups interpret the move through their own lenses of identity and belonging. The debate reflects larger societal concerns around language, culture, and inclusivity, highlighting the complex interplay between historical roots and contemporary realities in shaping job requirements and governmental policies.

Read More at Thehindubusinessline →

Tags: Urdu, Jammu and kashmir, Identity, Inclusion,