August 4, 2025

Corporal punishment remains a contentious issue in many cultures, often regarded as an established parenting practice passed down through generations. In conservative societies, it is generally accepted, with many parents justifying their actions by claiming, "This is how I was raised, and I turned out fine." In India, nearly 77.5% of parents admit to using physical discipline, which signals a need for re-evaluation of its cultural legitimacy. Research shows that corporal punishment has long been viewed through the lens of intent rather than impact. Many cultures accept it as a reasonable method, but studies reveal it leads to behavioral and emotional problems in children that can persist into adulthood, manifesting as depression and low self-esteem. The damage caused by corporal punishment is further underscored by a significant study in 2021 that indicated children subjected to spanking exhibited unusual brain responses akin to those affected by more severe abuse. This fact raises questions about the efficacy of physical discipline, as it may induce immediate obedience but fails to produce long-term positive results. Proponents of corporal punishment often point to studies that suggest moderation may be acceptable. However, the empirical link between corporal punishment and adverse child outcomes is increasingly difficult to support, particularly when a considerable body of research consistently shows the negative implications of such practices. This raises the concern: are we putting children's well-being at risk for an outdated, ineffective discipline method? The ramifications of corporal punishment extend beyond individual children. Research indicates that adults who experienced physical punishment in childhood are likely to repeat these methods with their own children, creating a cycle of trauma that questions whether this practice is truly a cultural tradition or just trauma disguised as heritage. While it may be tempting to vilify parents who resort to corporal punishment, doing so fails to consider the significant influence of social and psychological circumstances—cultural expectations, trauma, and economic hardship—that drive these choices. For many, physical discipline appears as a practical solution amid various social pressures, despite its long-term consequences. Although advocacy for a blanket ban on corporal punishment seems straightforward, particularly in households where it remains commonplace despite school regulations, law alone won't effect change in a society where beliefs and social norms dominate. For effective change, instead of solely legislating against corporal punishment, a comprehensive approach is needed. This must involve both legal reform and transformation of the cultural mindset that upholds these practices, recognizing that mere laws cannot eliminate entrenched beliefs. Public education and behavioral nudges must be employed to shift societal norms and provide parents with non-violent disciplinary alternatives. Such changes will necessitate psychological, social, and institutional interventions that can be challenging to implement. Nonetheless, acknowledging the problem is the first essential step toward reform. In conclusion, the harms inflicted by corporal punishment significantly outweigh any purported benefits. Therefore, the focus should not merely rest on distinguishing corporal punishment from abuse but rather exploring the necessity of completely reevaluating such disciplinary practices. Ultimately, any successful resolution will require a united effort to reshape cultural attitudes towards discipline, making non-violent parenting the desired approach.

Read More at Thehindu →

Tags: Corporal punishment, Child discipline, Intergenerational trauma, Parenting techniques, Cultural norms,