August 10, 2025

President Donald Trump’s push to confirm federal judges isn’t just about the courts—it’s reshaping abortion rights across America! A lively review by The Associated Press reveals that nearly half of Trump’s latest 17 judicial nominees strongly oppose abortion. These judges have been linked to anti-abortion groups or have fought tough abortion restrictions in court — from state bans to challenges on abortion pills like mifepristone. Trump has given mixed signals about abortion but clearly wants states to decide the rules. Still, his judges get lifetime appointments, meaning they can influence abortion laws long after he leaves the White House. As Bernadette Meyler, a Stanford constitutional law professor, says, judicial picks "are a way of federally shaping the abortion question without going through Congress or making a big, explicit statement." Among the eight nominees known for anti-abortion stances, Whitney Hermandorfer fought Tennessee’s strict abortion ban and pushed legal defenses arguing abortion deserves "special scrutiny because 'this is the only medical procedure that terminates a life.'" Missouri's Maria Lanahan helped challenge FDA approval of the abortion pill, tried to cut Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding, and fought abortion rights based on religious freedom claims. Florida sees two powerful picks. Jordan Pratt called abortion a "barbaric practice" and worked with a conservative group opposing medication abortion. John Guard defended Florida's abortion ban as well. Joshua Divine from Missouri boasts an intense anti-abortion background, once calling himself a "zealot" and stating, "abortion is the killing of an innocent, genetically unique human being." He is involved in lawsuits questioning the safety of abortion medication and defending tight abortion laws, even after Missouri voters approved more abortion rights. Other nominees like Chad Meredith (Kentucky) and Bill Mercer (Montana) have stood strong supporting ultrasound requirements and 20-week abortion bans. Jennifer Mascott, headed for the 3rd Circuit Court, believes abortion decisions should be made by states, not the Supreme Court. Anti-abortion groups are thrilled with these picks. Katie Glenn Daniel from SBA Pro-Life America says, "We look forward to four more years of nominees cut from that mold." On the flip side, abortion rights activists warn this is a deep strategy to embed anti-abortion judges who could hamper challenges to abortion bans. Mini Timmaraju of Reproductive Freedom for All calls it a tactic where Trump "distances himself from abortion while appointing anti-abortion extremists at all levels." With Trump's judicial nominees shaping the courts, the battle over abortion rights is heated more than ever. The decisions these judges make could affect millions of people seeking abortion care across the United States for decades to come!

Read More at Economictimes →

Tags: Trump judicial nominees, Abortion restrictions, Anti-abortion views, Federal courts, Medication abortion, Supreme court,