Australia has introduced a unique law banning children under 16 from accessing social media. This move has caught the eye of the world, with mixed reviews. The BBC highlighted views from teenagers and critics who worry the ban might “isolate vulnerable teenagers and push children into unregulated corners of the internet.” Lord John Nash, a former UK education minister, called Australia’s move “brave” and wants the UK to follow suit. Reuters reported that countries like Britain, China, Malaysia, and the US are considering similar age rules. In the US, politician Rahm Emanuel supports the ban, saying it helps focus on education and child protection. Before the ban started, the New York Times called it a “grand social experiment.” After it began, they said Australia’s results could be a model or a warning. An ABC survey showed 75% of kids still plan to use social media despite the ban. Amnesty International warned that bans might push kids to unsafe, secret online spaces. Denmark also plans to ban social media for under-15s, with little pushback, according to its digital minister. Al Jazeera reported experts saying enforcement will be tough, age checks can be cheated, and harms happen on platforms not covered by the ban. For some youngsters, social media is helpful or even life-saving. Australian papers reflected this mix. The Sydney Morning Herald noted teenagers are finding ways around the ban, and there is a legal challenge. Polls show support but doubt over success. The Australian Financial Review said the ban “misses the mark” by ignoring social media algorithms. The Daily Telegraph celebrated the ban as “world-leading” and a victory for safety driven by a campaign against tech giants. Other voices honoring those involved include lobbyists, politicians, and child safety experts. Overall, Australia’s social media ban is a bold step stirring debate on children’s safety in the digital age.