The 2026 World Cup could face a major challenge as European countries debate a boycott due to US-Greenland tensions. This comes after US President Donald Trump suggested potential control over Greenland, alarmingly noted by European leaders since Greenland is part of Denmark, a NATO ally. Trump even hinted at tariffs against European countries opposing his Greenland demands. UEFA nations, which hold 16 of the World Cup’s 48 spots, have not yet taken a formal stance, but the idea of withdrawal is gaining serious consideration. In Germany, Bundestag member Jürgen Hardt said a boycott might be “a last resort to get Trump to see sense.” German football official Oke Göttlich questioned playing in a country “indirectly, and possibly soon directly, attacking Europe.” UK MPs Simon Hoare and Kate Osborne also raised boycott talks, with Osborne saying, “The USA should not be able to participate… so yes I support those calling for a boycott.” Meanwhile, France’s sports minister Marina Ferrari cautioned against mixing sports with politics for now, though did not rule out future decisions. The Dutch Football Association stressed following FIFA and government guidance. KNVB secretary general Gijs de Jong said the focus remains football, while president Frank Paauw stated there is no plan to boycott “so far.” Despite this, a Dutch petition urging withdrawal has 120,000 signatures. Historically, World Cup boycotts are rare but not new. The debate shows how political tensions could affect one of football’s biggest events, potentially turning the 2026 World Cup into a political flashpoint.