August 5, 2025

Dhanush has recently voiced his strong disapproval regarding the AI-modified climax in the re-release of the critically acclaimed film, Raanjhanaa, which originally premiered over a decade ago. In a heartfelt statement posted on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, he expressed his distress over the alterations made to what he considers a quintessential piece of cinema. He stated, 'The re-release of Raanjhanaa with an AI-altered climax has completely disturbed me.' Dhanush passionately believes that the new ending undermines the very essence of the film, which has resonated deeply with its audience across the years. Despite his strong opposition to the alteration, the filmmakers proceeded with the re-release. 'This alternate ending has stripped the film of its very soul, and the concerned parties went ahead with it despite my clear objection. This is not the film I committed to 12 years ago,' he detailed in his statement. Concerned about the broader implications of this trend, he added, 'The use of AI to alter films or content is a deeply concerning precedent for both art and artists. It threatens the integrity of storytelling and the legacy of cinema. I sincerely hope that stricter regulations are put in place to prevent such practices in the future.' Fellow filmmakers share Dhanush's sentiment; Aanand L Rai, the film's original director and co-producer, has publicly distanced himself from this AI-modified version. Reports indicate that Rai also opposes the alterations and has echoed the concerns surrounding the use of artificial intelligence in creative works. So, what led to the decision to use AI in the re-release of Raanjhanaa? According to a report by the Indian Express, the AI version of the film is being marketed as a means to provide audiences with a 'happy ending' to the originally tragic storyline that Raanjhanaa is known for. This reimagined conclusion aims to appeal to a more optimistic viewer perspective, but it raises questions about artistic integrity and the role of AI in storytelling. A video clip of the altered climax has circulated widely, showing Kundan - the character portrayed by Dhanush - waking up from his deathbed. This is in stark contrast to the original film's harrowing finale where his character tragically dies, resonating intensely with viewers for its emotional depth. The change effectively turns the poignant narrative on its head, prompting discussions about authorial intent, artistic expression, and the potential consequences of digitized storytelling methods. The broader conversation which has emerged during this controversy involves crucial questions: what happens to a filmmaker's original vision when technology intervenes? How does this impact audience perceptions and the classics of cinema? Art, by its nature, is often open to interpretation, but there are fundamental elements that exist to preserve the heart of a work. Whether for benefits or detriments, the role of AI in creative industries requires careful consideration. As these discussions unfold, it remains vital for artists, producers, and audiences alike to reflect on the impact of technology on storytelling and the preservation of cinema's rich legacy. As the film industry navigates this new terrain, the recent events surrounding the Raanjhanaa re-release are a clear indication that passionate voices like Dhanush will continue to advocate for artistic integrity. While technology presents innovative possibilities, the question remains: at what cost to the artistic expression and originality we cherish?

Read More at Economictimes →

Tags: Dhanush, Raanjhanaa, Ai, Film industry, Cinema,